This process includes an opportunity for faculty, staff, and student governance advisory comment periods regarding proposed significant changes to the HOP. It also includes opportunity for legal and executive leadership review before consideration by the president. The following steps apply to initiating a new policy or revising an existing policy in this category.
Step 3 — Stakeholder Review. This step involves further review as needed, including a POAG review and advisory comment period, a legal sufficiency review, and an executive sponsor endorsement.
This occurs before advancing the amendment for presidential consideration. Step 4 - Executive Endorsement and Approval. Step 5 - Policy Adoption.
The executive sponsor of the policy, or designee, is responsible for communicating the HOP policy amendment to key stakeholders within the University, and facilitating any training as required for successful policy implementation.
Before retiring a policy, the president must approve its removal. Step 1 — Educational Policy Formulation Governance. Step 2 — Executive Endorsement and Approval. Faculty Council will submit the proposed HOP amendment to the president, or designee, for consideration. Step 3 — Policy Adoption. This is done through its website and other appropriate channels.
Before retiring a policy from the HOP, the president must approve its removal. HOP Policy Template. Skip to main content. Search form. Home Authorized User Log in. Policy Statement. Reason for Policy. This policy applies to all University employees and students. Definitions specific to this policy. Executive Sponsor: The executive officer, typically a vice president, who officially advances and endorses a HOP policy.
HOP Amendment: A change made to the HOP, including the adoption of a new policy, revision to an existing policy, or retirement of a policy. Policy Impact Statement: An initiating document proposing a HOP amendment for a new policy or revision to an existing policy. Policy Owner: The individual responsible for assuring appropriate policy management of a specific HOP policy. Significant Change: A substantive edit to HOP policy content including changes to essential principle s , scope, or application.
Website for policy. Presidential consideration will be given only to proposed HOP amendments that follow the process steps outlined in this policy. Policy owners are responsible for initiating steps to create HOP policy, conduct periodic review of their policies, and take necessary action to update or retire a policy when deemed appropriate. The president grants final approval for appointments to the POAG. Policy Owner PO.
The PO is responsible for developing HOP policies for matters within the scope of his or her responsibility following steps outlined in this policy; initiating proper communication associated with policy rollout; initiating necessary policy related training; providing timely response to policy questions issued via the HOP website; conducting periodic review of his or her HOP policies; initiating timely updates to policies when necessary; serving as key contact for policy interpretation and exception approval; and initiating policy retirement when the policy is no longer relevant.
Executive Sponsor. The president has institutional authority for approving or denying any HOP amendment. Process Steps This process includes an opportunity for faculty, staff, and student governance advisory comment periods regarding proposed significant changes to the HOP.
The policy draft and policy impact statement must be submitted to the PPM. Step 2 — Preliminary Review. The PPM will review the initiating documents and develop a stakeholder review plan to ensure compliance with this policy. Attachment A is to be used for tenured and tenure-track offers, and Attachment B for non-tenure track offers. Where the offer of appointment is to a non-tenure track faculty title, the offer letter must state that the appointment is for the stated period of appointment only and without tenure.
All letters of offer must include a statement as follows:. All appointments to the faculty are subject to confirmation by the Board of Regents of The University of Texas System. Faculty members are subject to the relevant provisions of the Rules and Regulations of the Board of Regents and the Handbook of Operating Procedures of The University of Texas at Austin and to applicable state and federal laws.
New academic appointments funded from any source other than State-appropriated or endowment funds must be specifically limited to the period covered by funds that already have been awarded to the University. The department should explicitly and in writing inform the person being appointed of this condition, and a visiting or lecturer title should be used. Appointments may not be made on the basis of informal agreements with funding agencies on future grants, such as those represented by continuation of current grants from Federal agencies.
The PAR Process. PAR Checklists.
0コメント